Decision over crime law reference books may end up in court

Go to the profile of The Brief team
Jan 08, 2018

If you are a registered user on The Brief, please sign in.

The Brief provides exclusive access to the highest quality legal journalism, intelligence and thought-provoking analysis.


Go to the profile of Michael Hocken
Michael Hocken 4 months ago

People on the London Underground would be most unlikely to consider that those involved in the decision made any attempt at all to give even a mere veneer of impartiality to the selection process, and much more likely to conclude that this is but another example of "do as I say, and not as I do" on the part of the judicial establishment.

The fact that the most senior editorial advisor to one of the publications apparently took part in the meeting at which the decision was taken (and that neither he nor anyone else present seemingly saw fit to speak up, despite the fact that each and every one of them must unquestionably have been aware of this blindingly obvious conflict of interest), ought - if confirmed - to suffice to invalidate the whole process.

The fact that the Ministry has failed to produce the minutes of the said meeting but compounds the appearance of impropriety.